Radha’s Weblog

DM6060 Digital Media for Educators, Corocoran College of Art and Design

Blogs for Art Educators – Blog Question #2 October 25, 2008

Filed under: dm6060 — youloveradha @ 10:17 pm

Art21:

http://blog.art21.org/category/education/

The Art21 blog provides teachers with video, collaborative feedback, and articles involving ideas about teaching with contemporary art. Teachers don’t need to watch the video series, Art21, to reap the benefits of this blog. It’s education blog is unique in that it provides lesson concepts and ideas specifically surrounding current artists. It is a great tool to help bring the art world into your classroom.

It is organized by videos, guest blog posts, and education blog posts. These three main pages are set up in three columns. The first column contains the blog posts. The second contains a complete listing of blog posts categorized by contemporary artist, art medium, geographical area, and media format inserts. The third column contains outside links and archives.

Its audience focus is mainly art educators. I found Art21 really useful because its videos demonstrate ideas that we can use in our classrooms better than any written description. When I see a lesson idea played out, I have more confidence that I can recreate it myself.

Users can participate in the guest blog section of this web site. It promotes idea-exchange from all around the world. I liked this one posted by Joe Fusaro about students keeping sketchbooks to help build site-specific installations: http://blog.art21.org/2008/10/08/storytelling/.

Student Sketchbooks for Site Specifice Installations

Student Sketchbooks for Site Specifice Installations

adfasdf

Art Education 2.0:

http://arted20.ning.com/

gf

Art Education 2.0 was built to help art educators use digital technology to improve their teaching. The website claims that Art Education 2.0 is meant to encourage best practices sharing, collaboration, group projects and professional development opportunities. This site is meant to appeal to every art teacher, at all levels, from the brand new techie to the experienced pro.

Art Ed’s site is organized with tab-based navigation. Content is very structured and consists of the Main page (complete with current projects and largest blog posts directory), an Invite page, MyPage, a Members page, Photos, Videos, a Forum page, a Groups directory page , Blogs, and a Chat page. At first glance, the site seems very meaty, as if it would contain a lot of resources for teachers new to technology, but I have to say that to me, the most enjoyable part of the site is the current projects on the Main page. The rest of the site is mainly filled with different ways for teachers to communicate, either through groups, blogs, online chat, forums, RSS, etc. The site mainly functions as a portal where art teachers can collaborate by using the various communication tools, and share photos and videos (hence the name 2.0). Regardless though, its current projects section alone makes the site worth mentioning in this blog.

My favorite project currently posted on the Main page is the View Out My Window Exhibition that you can also get your students involved in:

View Out My Window Exhibition

View Out My Window Exhibition

Art Education 2.0 also provides great links to other sources for art teachers, like these two that I found: http://www.artjunction.org/index.php & http://www.carrotrevolution.com/rotoball/.

I would like to mention also that the above two cited web sites are really important to art teachers for more than just teaching resources. They contain activities for art teachers to participate in themselves, keeping their passion for their personal art practice strong, in turn keeping them inspired as teachers.

adsf

The Dana Foundation:

http://www.dana.org/artseducation.aspx

asdf

The Dana Foundation has an Arts Education Program section that supports professional development opportunities for art teachers, provides training to in-school arts specialists and professional artists who teach students in preK-12 in public schools, publishes periodicals and books related to the field, and organizes conferences around specific arts education topics. Dana also sponsors many public events like lectures, forums, podcasts, and radio programs. The site is set up in a three column, multi-section style, that allows visitors to jump from main headlines other specific interest areas, without a lot of mouse-clicks. It’s focus is providing arts education news to the general public, but also wants its site to be used by educators and policymakers.

Most important for art teachers is its blog on current books, news, and online journals that explores various topics of interest to the art educator. BrainWork, a bi-monthly newsletter, reprints news articles about arts education. The Dana Foundation web site also has several special publications for students and educators our field.

While this site’s Art Education section is not as large as some sites, because the Dana Foundation focuses mainly on education policy surrounding specific brain development issues, it brings me more articles based on scientific research than other sites, proving the value of arts education. It’s blog’s current top story:Arts Advocates are Left Behind Online shows that I can come to one central location or subscribe to one RSS feed, to find the latest articles on Arts Education. Journal articles and radio web casts are also free. I think it is really important for us as teachers to be aware of what is happening in education policy. More importantly, we need to arm ourselves with knowledge of why teaching art is so important. I have forwarded some of these articles to other subject area teachers in my school, hoping to shatter some ideas that they have about the value of the classes I teach.

 

More Open Source Tid Bits October 25, 2008

Filed under: dm6060 — youloveradha @ 7:13 am

After writing last week’s blog about open source software for art educators, I was pleasantly surprised by all of the technical marvels that have been created by passionate people. I want to review one more open source software package that is not necessarily specific to art teachers (Celestia), because I find it both clever and very revealing. Before going over the specifics about why this package is worth your time, I want to ask the class to help me define what the difference is between open source, freeware and shareware.

Si Chen writes on her blog, http://opensourcestrategies.blogspot.com/2005/09/freeware-vs-shareware-vs-open-source.html, that all three terms refer to “free” software, but all are based on different business models. Chen cites freeware as “software which can be downloaded, used, and copied without restrictions.” He explains that the main difference between freeware and open source is that users of freeware do not have access to its code, and therefore are not welcome to improve upon it by making changes to it.

Chen claims that shareware is a different animal. According to Chen, shareware is not really free, just a “Free Sample.” Eventually we are required to purchase the software to continue to use it past its trial date, and of course, the user does not have access to its code either.

Chen also points out that while open source means that the source code of the software is free to use, change and reuse, some levels of support and documentation may cost you cash. He also makes the generalizations that “ Freeware is usually a very small program, released by a student or enthusiast…Shareware is usually a mid-sized utility or application, written by a professional developer or small software company. The developer or publisher does not have the resources to market it, so they release it as shareware with a “try-before-you-buy” business model…Open source spans the gamut, but the largest “free” software out there are all open source.”

Do you think the above definitions are missing some important details, or has Chen summarized the most important points? More importantly, does anyone know of a good grading software, comparable to Micrograde, that is Mac compatible and OPEN SOURCE? I’m tired of spending 75 dollars every year for it.

On to Celestia: I have been contemplating buying a telescope for my niece, but first I wanted to see how much she could learn about the solar bodies through the computer. I wanted to see if the digitally generated models from the program would increase her understanding of the universe. Well, I didn’t get that far, because I still haven’t mastered its controls enough to demonstrate anything to her.

I downloaded the program and installed it in seconds, but did not bother to read any help text that came with it, because I just don’t do that sort of thing! I have figured out how to view the galaxy from any point in it, increase the speed of any orbiting body, and close-up to various celestial bodies. There were no nymphs, but this window-view of the heavenly creation was still pretty cool. I just need to read the damn user guide before I share it with my super intelligent niece. I suppose that I could claim that Celestia isn’t user friendly enough or intuitive enough to allow me to just jump right in and utilize everything it has to offer, but I have been toying with it late at night. Seeing as though I may have been a little slow at those times, it would be unfair for me to come to that conclusion.

"The asteroid which is headed towards a very close passage by Mars in late January 2008." - from www.celestiamotherlode.net

“The asteroid which is headed towards a very

close passage by Mars in late January 2008.”

- from www.celestiamotherlode.net

 

An Open-Source Software Survey for the Art Teacher – Blog Question #3 October 21, 2008

Filed under: dm6060 — youloveradha @ 8:56 pm
Tags:

According to one Harrisonburg, Virginia school teacher, school districts can save thousands upon thousands of dollars on various software by using open source applications. Rob Lineweaver has summarized how much it would cost to set up an entire district’s school system on open source software verses conventional packages: http://staff.harrisonburg.k12.va.us/~rlineweaver/. Estimates on this site show that using open source can save school districts an extra $27,000 per year in software licensing costs. He even states: “This makes it apparent that not all of the benefit of open source software deployment in is the form of cost savings; much of the benefit is in terms of capabilities gained. In other words, through the use of free software, I am able to do more within my budget than I could if I only had commercial solutions available.”

While this site only describes the software necessary to set up the infrastructure of a school district, others describe specific applications an teacher would find useful in the classroom. The Society of Digital Artists has put together a comparison of 3D modeling tools: http://wiki.cgsociety.org/index.php/Comparison_of_3d_tools. On this page is listed the pro’s and con’s of various packages, some freeware and others commercial. Of the list, three freeware packages are cited: Art of Illusion, Blender, and Wings3D. According to this list, using a freeware package for 3D modeling can save you anywhere from 300 to 6,000 dollars. I noticed from the CGSociety’s software comparison web page that the Art of Illusion contains the most limitations as far as texturing, painting, animation and simulation. While Art of Illusion can render objects quite well, Wings3D seems to be the most comprehensive program to use. The main drawback to using Wings3D is that it tends to crash on Macs. Based on the reviews of Chris Dudar on http://www.atpm.com/13.04/wings3d.shtml, Blender is a good competitor of Wings3D because it has more to offer in its menus, but it can be difficult to learn and is reminiscent of ugly that ugly Windows CAD program you had to use in high school (you will also need a 3-button mouse to use it well).

GIMP, which stands for GNU Image Manipulation Program, is considered very user-friendly by the average non-techy’s standards. According to Dr. Benny’s blog: http://doctorbenny.blogspot.com/2008/09/open-source-software-review-gimp.html, you can manipulate multiple layers, without paying over 700 dollars for PhotoShop:

Dr. Benny using GIMP

Dr. Benny using GIMP

You can customize how it uses your system’s resources (good if you are using a raggedy old PC), but unfortunately, its installation files can be hard to find (I had trouble finding them myself) and installation on a PC is cumbersome.

CamStudio is something I am very excited about, because my recent 30 day trial of Camtasia has expired and I need something ASAP for work! The expert editors at www.download.com give it 3 out of 5 stars. They say that there is “no zoom feature, a variety of compressors or file types, or a video editor in the free CamStudio 2.5 (beta).” You also cannot trim video. You can however record everything that takes place on your screen into an AVI or Flash format. According to www.download.com, it is easy to use, easy to “pan” and record with sound. You can also attach various videos together with comments, a timestamp and watermark. This is probably all a teacher needs to create a demo video for students. Compare it to Camtasia and save between 200 to 300 dollars, but…CamStudio is only available for PC!! Whaaah!

Inkscape is a great replacement for vector graphics editors like Illustrator, Freehand, CorelDraw, or Xara X. Mahesh Bhat recommends the use of Inkscape based on good usability, compatibility, and price on his blog http://kalaalog.com/2007/04/15/inkscape/. In fact all of the graphics on his blog are created using Inkscape. He claims that the learning curve is not steep. If you are not a full-time artist or a graphic designer, Inkscape has great capabilities. Check out the blog banner he made using Inkscape:

Mahesh's blog banner, made using Inkscape.

Mahesh's blog banner, made using Inkscape

The interface of Inkscape is similar to that of GIMP, simple to use with a variety of tools. It uses a file type called SVG, Scalable Vector Graphics. Many programs use EPS as a filetype, and Inkscape unfortunately does not import EPS files well, but may in the near future (according to their website). You can download a copy from the Inkscape site: http://inkscape.org/download/. Right now you can download version 0.46 in Windows or Mac, and the older 0.45 version for Linux (not that any of us use that). The Inkscape site labels version 0.46 as stable, and I suppose that means that most bugs have been worked out. Using Inkscape can save a teacher anywhere from 320 to 500 dollars on other types of commercial vector graphics editors like Adobe Illustrator CS3.

Now we come to video editors. Of course there’s always iMovie (which comes installed on your Mac) and Movie Maker (installed on your boring PC), but there are a ton of other free video editing software packages out there. Here’s a non-comprehensive list: Avid Free DV, Jump Cut, Virtual Dub, Wax, Zwei-Stein, Jahshaka, and HyperEngine-AV. About.com rated Avid Free DV their number one free video editor, but unfortunately when I Googled it, I found that it was no longer available. After looking through this long list of free editors, I have come to the conclusion that I like Jahshaka best.

Jahshaka is available for PCs, Macs, and Linux too. Jason Walsh, of UK’s site www.MacUser.co.uk, claims that Jahshaka will one day be an excellent open source application and a good substitute for commercial application such as Final Cut Pro HD, but right now, “it’s just not there yet.” It is called a ‘compositing’ and animation software. I think compositing means that you can arrange, trim, and append video clips. According to Walsh, Jahshaka has a steep learning curve. The user needs to import clips and store them as assets in the applications ‘libraries’ that are then edited using the compositing and animation tools. This application reminds me of GarageBand in the way it looks, with a single window. Walsh has written that while Jahshaka was designed for multi-platform use, it works best with Power Mac G5s using the Nvidia graphics chip. This sounds like an obscure conclusion, right? Walsh writes this because Jahshaka’s performance depends a lot on your graphics chip, so those users with Intel graphics won’t fair as well. Luckily I am a Mac user so I won’t have to worry about this.

You can import animation files and then treat them as layers, with the ability to adjust each layer. You can make adjustments to layers such as embossing and other 3D filters. You can also add additional text and ‘painted’ graphics.

This application was easy for me to get started with because it works in clips, like GarageBand, but I had some trouble with the spinning beach ball of death. This application can work with DV, AVI, and QuickTime, Mpeg, MP3, MP2, and WAV files. You can save your project so that it plays as a DivX video. Considering that Final Cut Pro comes in the Final Cut Studio package, which goes for 1,299 dollars, I am perfectly okay with my non-mature Jahshaka. Check out their site to download your own copy and see what can be made using this application: www.jahshaka.org, or take a look a this clip from their site (made entirely from Jahshaka):

Now we come to video editors. Of course there’s always iMovie (which comes installed on your Mac) and Movie Maker (installed on your boring PC), but there are a ton of other free video editing software packages out there. Here’s a non-comprehensive list: Avid Free DV, Jump Cut, Virtual Dub, Wax, Zwei-Stein, Jahshaka, and HyperEngine-AV. About.com rated Avid Free DV their number one free video editor, but unfortunately when I Googled it, I found that it was no longer available. After looking through this long list of free editors, I have come to the conclusion that I like Jahshaka best.

Jahshaka is available for PCs, Macs, and Linux too. Jason Walsh, of UK’s site www.MacUser.co.uk, claims that Jahshaka will one day be an excellent open source application and a good substitute for commercial application ssuch as Final Cut Pro HD, but right now, “it’s just not there yet.” It is called a ‘compositing’ and animation software. I think compositing means that you can arrange, trim, and append video clips. According to Walsh, Jahshaka has a steep learning curve. The user needs to import clips and store them as assets in the applications ‘libraries’ that are then edited using the compositing and animation tools. This application reminds me of GarageBand in the way it looks, with a single window. Walsh has written that while Jahshaka was designed for multi-platform use, it works best with Power Mac G5s using the Nvidia graphics chip. This sounds like an obscure conclusion, right? Walsh writes this because Jahshaka’s performance depends a lot on your graphics chip, so those users with Intel graphics won’t fair as well. Luckily I am a Mac user so I won’t have to worry about this.

You can import animation files and then treat them as layers, with the ability to adjust each layer. You can make adjustments to layers such as embossing and other 3D filters. You can also add additional text and ‘painted’ graphics.

This application was easy for me to get started with because it works in clips, like GarageBand, but I had some trouble with the spinning beach ball of death. This application can work with DV, AVI, and QuickTime, Mpeg, MP3, MP2, and WAV files. You can save your project so that it plays as a DivX video. Considering that Final Cut Pro comes in the Final Cut Studio package, which goes for 1,299 dollars, I am perfectly okay with my non-mature Jahshaka. Check out their site to download your own copy and see what can be made using this application: www.jahshaka.org, or take a look a this clip from their site (made entirely from Jahshaka):

And now we come to video editors. Of course there’s always iMovie (which comes installed on your Mac) and Movie Maker (installed on your boring PC), but there are a ton of other free video editing software packages out there. Here’s a non-comprehensive list: Avid Free DV, Jump Cut, Virtual Dub, Wax, Zwei-Stein, Jahshaka, and HyperEngine-AV. About.com rated Avid Free DV their number one free video editor, but unfortunately when I Googled it, I found that it was no longer available. After looking through this long list of free editors, I have come to the conclusion that I like Jahshaka best.

Jahshaka is available for PCs, Macs, and Linux too. Jason Walsh, of UK’s site www.MacUser.co.uk, claims that Jahshaka will one day be an excellent open source application and a good substitute for commercial application ssuch as Final Cut Pro HD, but right now, “it’s just not there yet.” It is called a ‘compositing’ and animation software. I think compositing means that you can arrange, trim, and append video clips. According to Walsh, Jahshaka has a steep learning curve. The user needs to import clips and store them as assets in the applications ‘libraries’ that are then edited using the compositing and animation tools. This application reminds me of GarageBand in the way it looks, with a single window. Walsh has written that while Jahshaka was designed for multi-platform use, it works best with Power Mac G5s using the Nvidia graphics chip. This sounds like an obscure conclusion, right? Walsh writes that this because Jahshaka’s performance depends a lot on your graphics chip, so those users with Intel graphics won’t fair as well. Luckily I am a Mac user so I won’t have to worry about this.

You can import animation files and then treat them as layers, with the ability to adjust each layer. You can make adjustments to layers such as embossing and other 3D filters. You can also add additional text and ‘painted’ graphics.

This application was easy for me to get started with because it works in clips, like GarageBand, but I had some trouble with the spinning beach ball of death. This application can work with DV, AVI, and QuickTime, Mpeg, MP3, MP2, and WAV files. You can save your project so that it plays as a DivX video. Considering that Final Cut Pro comes in the Final Cut Studio package, which goes for 1,299 dollars, I am perfectly okay with my non-mature Jahshaka. Check out their site to download your own copy and see what can be made using this application, www.jahshaka.org:

Jahshaka's Clip-Style Window

Jahshaka's Clip-Style Editing Window